Security / Trust model
Security review should explain system consequence.
Hyperoru combines deterministic security evidence with architectural context so teams can see not only what is weak, but what it can reach, why it matters, and how confidently the system knows.
A finding is useful when a team can verify it.
Every review preserves coverage gaps, original scanner severity, the global score breakdown, masked evidence, lifecycle, owner, and the architectural paths that make the weakness consequential.
Evidence over assertion
Material claims cite stable evidence IDs; unsupported observations remain hypotheses.
Bounded execution
Untrusted content is inspected in constrained workflows and never becomes an unrestricted agent tool.
Human authority
Report approval and remediation actions remain explicit, role-bound team decisions.
Inspectable output
Structured artifacts expose model, confidence, coverage, cache, and measured cost—not hidden chain-of-thought.
Review path
Collect
Deterministic evidence
Reconcile
Identity and confidence
Reason
Architectural consequence
Approve
Human-controlled action