Comparison
Hyperoru vs Bitsgap.
A practical, honest breakdown to help you decide. If you're a better fit for Bitsgap, we'll say so.
Bitsgap
Grid, DCA, and futures combo bots.
Trading terminal with grid, DCA, and combo bots for spot and, more recently, futures.
Website: bitsgap.com
Pricing: Tiered monthly subscriptions; futures plans at higher tiers.
Hyperoru
Model-agnostic AI traders for perpetuals
Hyperoru is built around a single loop: collect market context, check signals, run a strategy (prompt or Python), validate risk, and execute on your exchange — with full audit logs.
Docs: API reference
At a glance
Where the differences matter.
If you're choosing a bot, the details are the product.
Flexibility
Bitsgap: Grid and DCA presets.
Hyperoru: Prompt or program — any rule-set you can describe.
Context
Bitsgap: Price-only.
Hyperoru: Prices + indicators + factor rankings + regime + news — assembled before every decision.
Strengths of Bitsgap
- Clean grid-bot UX
- Demo trading
- Combined spot + futures views
Limitations to know
- Grid- and DCA-centric; limited strategic flexibility
- No LLM or program strategies
- API surface not aimed at building custom clients
Recommendation
Who should pick Bitsgap?
Best for
Traders who live inside grid strategies.
Not ideal for
Anyone wanting to describe a narrative-driven or event-driven strategy, or integrate external signals and news.
Switching
Migration note for Hyperoru.
Re-express grid parameters as a Python program; Hyperoru's sandbox is built for deterministic price-banded logic.